Data Collectors

[Tommy Pelham]

Need to know everyones opinion on Data Collectors....

I have a couple of 48gx's with SMI........

Time to UPGRADE...........

Running Carlson 2007 Standalone on office side.

Thanks!

[Terry Watson]

We are using SMI Jett Robotic and are looking at the DC50 by Precission. The
only problem we have had is with the screeen on the Jett. The good thing
about SMI on the Jett is, no learning curve. The bad, is paying for support
with SMI. We are using Carlson Standalone 2007 on the desktop.

"Tommy Pelham" <tvpelham@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:f4sue8$vln$1@update.carlsonsw.com...

Need to know everyones opinion on Data Collectors....

I have a couple of 48gx's with SMI........

Time to UPGRADE...........

Running Carlson 2007 Standalone on office side.

Thanks!

[BSS]

We have TDS Recon collectors and also two Juniper Systems Allegros. The
Allegros run Carlson SurvCE which allows seamless data transfer from office
to field and vice versa. The TDS software has one or two routines that are
very nice in the field, (Inverse Point ot Line for instance) but the data
transfer isn't as smooth. (It actually isn't the data transfer, it's the
conversion from one file format to another, which isn't necessary in the
SurvCE software.) The Allegro is quite a bit more money but has a keyboard
while the Recon is exclusively touchscreen or navigation buttons. I prefer
the Allegro, my field crews tend to prefer the Recons. (They are smaller and
lighter.) They both freeze in extreme cold and cease functioning. Feel
free to e-mail with questions and good luck finding something.


"Tommy Pelham" <tvpelham@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:f4sue8$vln$1@update.carlsonsw.com...

Need to know everyones opinion on Data Collectors....

I have a couple of 48gx's with SMI........

Time to UPGRADE...........

Running Carlson 2007 Standalone on office side.

Thanks!

[John Macolini]

I still use TDS on an HP200. It still works. I've used newer DC's,
including Carlson on the Allegro and Explorer.

I honestly don't see much of an advantage to upgrading. They still store
data and allow you to perform minor calcs. The transfer routine is a little
slow and buggy - but works.

I'd stick with what you have, until you have to change.


"BSS" <survey@suscom-maine.net> wrote in message
news:f4uttj$jjp$1@update.carlsonsw.com...

We have TDS Recon collectors and also two Juniper Systems Allegros. The
Allegros run Carlson SurvCE which allows seamless data transfer from
office to field and vice versa. The TDS software has one or two routines
that are very nice in the field, (Inverse Point ot Line for instance) but
the data transfer isn't as smooth. (It actually isn't the data transfer,
it's the conversion from one file format to another, which isn't necessary
in the SurvCE software.) The Allegro is quite a bit more money but has a
keyboard while the Recon is exclusively touchscreen or navigation buttons.
I prefer the Allegro, my field crews tend to prefer the Recons. (They are
smaller and lighter.) They both freeze in extreme cold and cease
functioning. Feel free to e-mail with questions and good luck finding
something.


"Tommy Pelham" <tvpelham@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:f4sue8$vln$1@update.carlsonsw.com...
Need to know everyones opinion on Data Collectors....

I have a couple of 48gx's with SMI........

Time to UPGRADE...........

Running Carlson 2007 Standalone on office side.

Thanks!

[Col Cadman]

John Macolini wrote:

I still use TDS on an HP200. It still works. I've used newer DC's,
including Carlson on the Allegro and Explorer.

I honestly don't see much of an advantage to upgrading. They still store
data and allow you to perform minor calcs. The transfer routine is a little
slow and buggy - but works.

I'd stick with what you have, until you have to change.


"BSS" <survey@suscom-maine.net> wrote in message
news:f4uttj$jjp$1@update.carlsonsw.com...

We have TDS Recon collectors and also two Juniper Systems Allegros. The
Allegros run Carlson SurvCE which allows seamless data transfer from
office to field and vice versa. The TDS software has one or two routines
that are very nice in the field, (Inverse Point ot Line for instance) but
the data transfer isn't as smooth. (It actually isn't the data transfer,
it's the conversion from one file format to another, which isn't necessary
in the SurvCE software.) The Allegro is quite a bit more money but has a
keyboard while the Recon is exclusively touchscreen or navigation buttons.
I prefer the Allegro, my field crews tend to prefer the Recons. (They are
smaller and lighter.) They both freeze in extreme cold and cease
functioning. Feel free to e-mail with questions and good luck finding
something.


"Tommy Pelham" <tvpelham@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:f4sue8$vln$1@update.carlsonsw.com...

Need to know everyones opinion on Data Collectors....

I have a couple of 48gx's with SMI........

Time to UPGRADE...........

Running Carlson 2007 Standalone on office side.

Thanks!





I couldn't agree more. We have been using the TDS on the HP200 for many

years now. It works really well. The little extras in the new versions
are hard to justify.
We download the cr5 file to the PC with windows terminal no problems
then convert the cr5 to a crd file. The cr5 file is kept in the field
work directory and the crd file in the carlson working directory. That
way we have a trail which has proved to be very useful in repairing and
tracking files etc., Terminal automatically archives existing files
which are downloaded from the 200 so we have a trail of fieldwork files
for each site visit. When we import the latest cr5 file we import to
temp file then "compare files" with the existing crd file and import the
new data. It may seem complex but has proven to be very useful.

[John Macolini]

You should try downloading the rw5 instead of the cr5 (from the HP200).

It's easy in the Data Collector pull-down. I usually make a backup, and
then Edit-Process Raw Data File. And then use the Field to Finish.




"Col Cadman" <col@surveyor.net.au> wrote in message
news:f5ac7p$jui$1@update.carlsonsw.com...

I couldn't agree more. We have been using the TDS on the HP200 for many
years now. It works really well. The little extras in the new versions are
hard to justify.
We download the cr5 file to the PC with windows terminal no problems then
convert the cr5 to a crd file. The cr5 file is kept in the field work
directory and the crd file in the carlson working directory. That way we
have a trail which has proved to be very useful in repairing and tracking
files etc., Terminal automatically archives existing files which are
downloaded from the 200 so we have a trail of fieldwork files for each
site visit. When we import the latest cr5 file we import to temp file then
"compare files" with the existing crd file and import the new data. It may
seem complex but has proven to be very useful.

[Neff]

Tommy Pelham wrote:

Need to know everyones opinion on Data Collectors....

I have a couple of 48gx's with SMI........

Time to UPGRADE...........

Running Carlson 2007 Standalone on office side.

Thanks!

Do you want to sell one of your hp48gx?




##-----------------------------------------------##
Article posted with CarlsonSWNewGroups
http://CarlsonSWNewGroups.sourceforge.net
Share your knowledge in... carlson.carlson-survey
##-----------------------------------------------##