Page 1 of 1

Grid file vs. FLT

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:23 am
by Terry Strickland
Hi all,
Which would be more accurate for staking elevations in the field, a grid
file or a tin (flt) file? Also, will the new binary tin file be
supported in a future release of SurvCE?
thanks,
terry strickland

Re: Grid file vs. FLT

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:07 pm
by lwatson
Terry,

If you are staking something like a golf course or a gentle rolling type of
surface, either format would be fine. But if you are staking a site, road
or any type of surface with defined "breaks", you definitely want to use a
tin file. The latest version of SurvCE (available for download) supports
the new *.tin format.


"Terry Strickland" <jtstrickland@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:dh782e$8sl$1@update.carlsonsw.com...
Hi all,
Which would be more accurate for staking elevations in the field, a grid
file or a tin (flt) file? Also, will the new binary tin file be supported
in a future release of SurvCE?
thanks,
terry strickland