Disable Reactor in Translate & Rotate

[Duckman]

When translating or rotating points you are given an option to
'Disable Reactor'. And the reactor is from what the help files
imply is the linking of objects. i.e. Annotation to Lines &
Lines to Points. So when translating or rotating a group of
points that are linked, why do you have to answer yes to the
"Disable Reactor?" question, to get the bearings to move to the
correct lines? If I wanted my links to remain active I should
answer yes to this not no. It just seems a little backwards to
me or is my thinking backwards.

[Rich]

On 19 Jul 2006 17:42:50 GMT, Duckman <duckmanwork@hotmail.com> wrote:

When translating or rotating points you are given an option to
'Disable Reactor'. And the reactor is from what the help files
imply is the linking of objects. i.e. Annotation to Lines &
Lines to Points. So when translating or rotating a group of
points that are linked, why do you have to answer yes to the
"Disable Reactor?" question, to get the bearings to move to the
correct lines? If I wanted my links to remain active I should
answer yes to this not no. It just seems a little backwards to
me or is my thinking backwards.

Yes; we have no bananas.

Take care,

Rich

[Doug Sims]

I agree, I don't understand that either.
--Doug

Rich wrote:

On 19 Jul 2006 17:42:50 GMT, Duckman <duckmanwork@hotmail.com> wrote:

When translating or rotating points you are given an option to
'Disable Reactor'. And the reactor is from what the help files
imply is the linking of objects. i.e. Annotation to Lines &
Lines to Points. So when translating or rotating a group of
points that are linked, why do you have to answer yes to the
"Disable Reactor?" question, to get the bearings to move to the
correct lines? If I wanted my links to remain active I should
answer yes to this not no. It just seems a little backwards to
me or is my thinking backwards.

Yes; we have no bananas.

Take care,

Rich