Twist Point Attributes

When twisting point attributes, the routine will use the "point" itself
as
the rotation or twist point when using the "entity segment" option. This
works well. However, when using the "follow polyline" option, the
attributes
use each individual attributes origin as the rotation or twist point.
This
nullifies the usefulness of the routine. Many times point numbers are
rotated over the point itself and can no longer be read. Entity segment
obviously does not work for the entire centerline of a road, which is
what I
need. "Follow" needs to be fixed to work like the other options "twist
screen" and "entity segment" to use the POINT as the rotation point and
not
each attribute origin. Since my job includes stake out sheets for
surveyors,
this feature is EXTREMELY important to me.
I feel that the discussion groups are a great outlet and I praise
SurvCADD
for creating them. I feel that is more important to share program
problems
with others than to submit them to tech support only. My emails are
meant
for information sharing only and are not criticisms.
Keep up the good work Carlson!
Jack
as
the rotation or twist point when using the "entity segment" option. This
works well. However, when using the "follow polyline" option, the
attributes
use each individual attributes origin as the rotation or twist point.
This
nullifies the usefulness of the routine. Many times point numbers are
rotated over the point itself and can no longer be read. Entity segment
obviously does not work for the entire centerline of a road, which is
what I
need. "Follow" needs to be fixed to work like the other options "twist
screen" and "entity segment" to use the POINT as the rotation point and
not
each attribute origin. Since my job includes stake out sheets for
surveyors,
this feature is EXTREMELY important to me.
I feel that the discussion groups are a great outlet and I praise
SurvCADD
for creating them. I feel that is more important to share program
problems
with others than to submit them to tech support only. My emails are
meant
for information sharing only and are not criticisms.
Keep up the good work Carlson!
Jack